Hi Elpidio,
I don't have any problem with that, and I think it is the most reasonable way to answer to my 'proposal'.
I appologize for not having too much time (I write to this list from my work, and a company needs to have productive people, not 'talkie' ones.. and at house I have other duties - I will become father soon, and my wife is a lot more important than 'computer stuff'.. so, maybe my messages are incomplete as solutions, or I suppose things that are not real (like an sql inject vulnerability), but I do what I can and I simply wanted that the people on this list be aware of that, if thery are not yet..
I also want to say that my opinion is just that: an opinion. I am a programer, but a programmer who is also a user and likes to think about clear user interfaces.
So, it seems to me logic to separate staff and patient and I *proposed* a solution.
If it seems good to the developers team who really do the job and may have other, much more important things to do.. well. If they find it good and have time to do it, that is very well, if not, there is no problem. I do not want to impose my opinions to anybody..
We shoudn't react too hard to the opinions here in the list, but to take them as good if they are good or as bad if they are bad, as mature people do. I personally do not like un-ending and un-productive discussions like in other forums..
-- Daniel Ignat PHP Programmer and SysAdmin
Elpidio Latorilla wrote:
Hi Daniel Ignat,
thanks for the good ideas. They are all correct solutions.
The final decision lies on the hands of Walter and his team. If they need to add more controls on the search page, they should do it. The basic principle here is:
" Do not do what Care2x wants you to do, but do what is needed to solve your own problem ".
Since a problem could have many variants, the solution could have many variants too. If it is proven (in practice) that one's variant applies to most cases, it will be taken over to the main release versions.
In any case, I would like to remind all of us that when we design a solution to a problem, let us think like a non-programmer or non-technical person because the end-user of care2x does not think like a programmer.
Best regards, Elpidio
On Friday 12 November 2004 02:24, Daniel Ignat wrote:
Hi!
I saw that also and it seems to me a little bit annoying to mix personnel and patients.. but you also are right about duplicate data if someone from the personnel gets sick..
so, my suggestion is this (for the main developers of care2x): is it possible to put an unchecked 'check box' in the 'search person' form, so that you may 'include', *if you want* the personnel data (as an exception), in the search query?..
or maybe better, 2 radio buttons: - only personnel, only patients this way you will not have to look for all the patients (including the filter) either when looking for personnel..
it is not difficult for the developer who has done that form, but it would be a great feature for the user. there is only one check box with a text, then a filter in the sql query..
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8 _______________________________________________ Care2002-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/care2002-developers
