Does it means that Care2x main developers are trying to reinventing the wheel?...
I mean.. HL7 is a "de facto" standar in the industry... why do you want to work defining a new interchange protocol?... ok, HL7 could be not the best "protocol" but is supported by the bigs in the industry. I think the efford should be focused in HL7 (and maybe in developing a better standard and pray so the rest of industry decide to throw all its past investment in HL7 to embrace the new standard). But this is the great point of opensource... anyone can develop HL7 support if he wants to... No matter what Elpigio or otherones think about. Julio Bonis -----Mensaje original----- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de J. Antas Enviado el: martes, 16 de noviembre de 2004 12:59 Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: [Care2002-developers] Did Siemens released an HXP protocol of its own? It seems that while we are all happily discussing the sex of the angels the big moguls were busy working on the most refreshing ideas. After a hot discussion about the subject of embracing (or not) the HL-7 definition (I would not call it a protocol... yet), an idea has grown among certain Care2x developers that an independent Health Exchange Protocol was the better way to go. When that idea potential was realized Care2x's project leader, Elpidio Latorilla, just put 2+2 together and did a quick fix of the old RPC-XML protocol with the new health exchange needs and quickly tried make it is own. The HXP protocol was born. If you take a look at the "About the authors" page at the HXP site http://hxp.sourceforge.net/ , you will perhaps get the idea that all that was born from the Elpidio's own mind. I will not even raise the issue of intellectual honesty. The HXP protocol, being based in RPC-XML had nothing innovative (see the RPC-XML site at http://www.xmlrpc.com/). But, in a sense, the XML part of it would certainly grant HXP a nice future. So, guess what? It seems that Siemens just did the same as Elpidio. But this time it was done the right way. The definition is related to XML and looks only related to auditing procedures in healthcare... but auditing encompasses all what you can do in a health information system. The paper has just been released as a Internet Engineering Task Force (www.ietf.org) request-for-comment (RFC) number 3881: RFC: 3881 Author: G. Marshall / Siemens Category: Informational Date: September 2004 Link: ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3881.txt Although being released as an auditing tool facilitator, the bases for a much larger project are all there. Is it a goodbye HXP, hello RFC3881? "There are roads which must not be followed, armies which must be not attacked... the student of war who is unversed in the art of war of varying his plans, even though he be acquainted with the Five Advantages, will fail to make the best use of his men." Sun Tzu, The Art of War, http://www.kimsoft.com/polwar8.htm Best regards, J. Antas ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8 _______________________________________________ Care2002-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/care2002-developers ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8 _______________________________________________ Care2002-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/care2002-developers
