Made it both INT(4)
ALTER TABLE `care_users` CHANGE `user_role` `user_role` INT(4) DEFAULT '0' NOT
NULL;
ALTER TABLE `care_user_roles` CHANGE `id` `id` INT(4) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT;
ALTER TABLE `care2x`.`care_yellow_paper` DROP KEY `nr`;
SVN 6783 fixed.
FK relationships avoided as we need the admin with role 0 to be present in
users table, without a id = 0 in the user roles table.
- Ap.Muthu
> Rough cut of ERD shows only 2 relationships.
> The code does not respect the relationships however.
>
> table care_user_roles Primary Key 'id' is an INT
> Foreign Key 'user_role' in table care_users is a Tiny INT
>
> If the numebr of anticipated roles is going to be < 256 then a TinyINT would
> suffice.
> Keeping it an INT would be better for both.
> Must now fathom all links for it.
>
> -Ap.Muthu
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Care2002-developers mailing list
Care2002-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/care2002-developers
