Hi Donna,

Thank you so much for your advice!  Sorry for the multiple copies of the 
original message that were posted to the list.  I was having some problems with 
my e-mail.

-Mellanie

Quoting Donna Hanlon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Mellanie,
> 
> It turns out these last two handles aren't that hard to patch after all.
> 
> In fact, they are a result of the ventricle filling gone awry (although 
> some manual patching did worsen the problems in this area.
> 
> After making the patches specified below, do FloodFill Vol2 and save the 
> resulting file as nov26_2002.R.full.segment_vent_corr18.mnc.  Then, load 
> SEGMENTATION/nov26_2002.R.full.segment.mnc as volume 1 (with 
> nov26_2002.R.full.segment_vent_corr18.mnc still loaded as volume 2).
> 
> Then, set your mask size to 20 and set mask center at 8, 97, 115.  Then 
> do vol1->vol2.  FloodFill Vol 2 again, and update handle count.
> 
> Save your edits, and I think you're ready to prepare for flatteining.
> 
> Occasionally, ventricle filling and/or automatic error correction 
> misbehaves.  While trying to be helpful, it fills something it 
> shouldn't.  If you notice the segmentation is white where the structural 
> MRI is dark, then compare the segment.mnc with the 
> segment_vent_corr.mnc.  If the latter is white where the former is dark, 
> then either ventricle filling or error correction is the culprit.  In 
> such cases, vol1->vol2 can come in quite handy.
> 
> Donna
> 
> On 08/05/2004 01:28 PM, Donna Hanlon wrote:
> 
> > Hi Mellanie,
> >
> > There are four very obvious handles in your segmentation that will 
> > cause crossovers in your flatmap.
> >
> > First, do FloodFill Vol2 to get an accurate handle count.  There are 
> > five remaining handles.  I can only see four, but the visible ones 
> > will cause flattening trouble.
> >
> > One on calcarine sulcus can be fixed in a coronal view by toggling 
> > these voxels off:
> > Toggled voxel at 9 32 69 off
> > Toggled voxel at 8 31 69 off
> > Toggled voxel at 9 31 69 off
> > Toggled voxel at 10 31 69 off
> > Toggled voxel at 10 30 70 off
> > Toggled voxel at 9 30 70 off
> > Toggled voxel at 9 29 71 off
> >
> > One near the ventral end of the parahippocampal gyrus can be fixed in 
> > a coronal view:
> >
> > Set Mask Center 28 92 54
> > Dilate once
> >
> > The two remaining handles are along the dorso-medial cortex, above the 
> > ventricles, in this neighborhood:
> >
> > 5,85-105,120
> > Coronal slice 85-105
> >
> > Here, it looks like some previous patching may have gone awry, zapping 
> > some voxels that should be on, and filling some that should be off. 
> > These handles are much trickier to fix, and I think I might start by 
> > setting a fairly large mask and loading the original 
> > "*segment_vent_corr.mnc" as Vol1, and using the vol1->vol2 feature. 
> > This has the effect of starting over with the original segmentation 
> > within a limited bounding box (i.e., you don't lose all your patches 
> > to the medial wall, subcortical structures, and occipital lobe, but 
> > you go back to the drawing board in the region of these two handles).  
> > I think it will be easier to patch the original handles than this 
> > post-patch region.
> >
> > I'm afraid that's all the advice I can give right now.
> >
> > Donna
> >
> > On 08/05/2004 12:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Donna,
> >> Is it acceptable to proceed with flattening even though there are a 
> >> few handles that are apparent on the inflated surface?  For example, 
> >> in the file that I have uploaded, there is an obvious handle on the 
> >> surface that I am having trouble localizing in the segmentation.  
> >> Will it cause distortions in the flatmap?
> >> The file is:
> >> nov26_2002.R.full.segment_vent_corr.patch10_vent_corr.patch5.mnc
> >> Thank You,
> >> Mellanie
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> caret-users mailing list
> >> caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
> >> http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
> >>
> >>  
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > caret-users mailing list
> > caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
> > http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> caret-users mailing list
> caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
> http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
> 


Reply via email to