Hi Marco,
Could you also upload the topo file?
Thanks,
Donna
On 06/20/2005 04:48 PM, marco tettamanti wrote:
Hi Donna!
I am back and was finally able to check. The metric file, as you suspected,
only contains the header. I have uploaded the metric file, the functional
volume (.hdr and .img in Analyze format) and the fiducial surface.
I am working on a Debian Linux platform.
Thank you for your help,
Marco
Hi Marco,
The Unknown spec file tag can be safely ignored.
My hunch is that the metric file is empty (except perhaps for the
header). How big is the file? If >1K, then upload your metric, volume,
and fiducial surface here:
http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/cgi-bin/upload.cgi
You were running Debian Linux, right?
Donna
On 06/10/2005 12:16 PM, marco tettamanti wrote:
Dear authors,
I am having problems with the "Map Volumes to Surface" utility. I am
following the very same procedure that used to work for me until release
Caret5.2 (included). Now I have dowloaded the release 5.3 and this
procedure no longer seems to work.
I am trying to map a metric (functional) image to a Fiducial coord file.
The algorithm doesn't report any errors and outputs:
Map to Spec File: lvs7b.L.spec
Metric File: map_data_0_10_Jun_2005_13_09_06.metric
Algorithm: Average Voxel
but in the bash shell I have got the followint report:
Unknown Spec File tag moved to header:
When I then try to open the .metric file that has been created, I receive
an error message:
Error while accessing X.metric: contains a different number of nodes than
Y.coord
This is strange, because the Y.coord file is exactly the same as the one
entered in the mapping algorithm.
Thank you for your advice!
Marco
