Hi,

 

Following the kind advice provided by Donna and David, et al,
previously, I have taken each of the Paint Columns available for the
Macaque F99UA1 (i.e. Lobes, LVE00, Felleman-VE all, PHT 00, etc) and
converted these to Paint Volumes in CARET, which I have then saved as
AFNI image volumes on my local disk. This has allowed me to apply the
various parcellations to MRI data that I have in the same species of
macaque.

 

I originally assumed that the signal intensities in the AFNI (.BRIK)
Paint Volume would correspond to the list of anatomical labels under
LUT_NAMES in the header (.HEAD). However this correspondence does not
seem to hold true for all the labels. For example, in LVE00, the region
that has a signal intensity of 18 is certainly V1, but in the LUT_NAMES
list 18 corresponds to V4.

 

Could there be any errors in the LUT_NAMES lists in the AFNI .HEAD
files, or is there another way to (easily) get a reliable list of the
anatomical labels that correspond to the signal intensities in the Paint
Volume image file?

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Many thanks.

 

Best wishes,

 

Hamied

 

_________________________________________________________

 

 Hamied A Haroon, PhD

 Research Associate in MR Neuroimaging

 Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering Research Group

 Research School of Cancer and Imaging Sciences

 Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences

 The University of Manchester

 Room G.603, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, M13 9PT

 Tel: 0161 275 6871   Fax: 0161 275 5145

 Mobile: 07961 488 472

 Email: [email protected]

 Web: http://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/hamied.haroon/

_________________________________________________________

 

 

_______________________________________________
caret-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users

Reply via email to