Probably the easiest way to get to the bottom of it is for us to look at your functional volume. Could you upload it here:
http://pulvinar.wustl.edu/cgi-bin/upload.cgi It appears that your cluster did not intersect the SPM5 average fiducial surface very well. I suspect you used AFM, rather than MFM. The latter likely would have improved the intersection. On 04/28/2010 12:29 PM, Yune S. Lee wrote: > > Dear Caret users, > > I'm a bit puzzled by different activation foci between caret and SPM5. > I mapped the same T-map onto the PALS_B12_standard_scenes.73730 spec > file for which I set SPM5 for mapping Atlas space. > Nonetheless, the output results in the caret looks quite different > such that the STS activation that is clearly seen in the SPM figure is > missing in the caret. > (See attached for the side-by-side comparison). I wonder if I did > something wrong during the volume mapping and any help would be greatly > appreciated. > > Thanks, > YSL > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > caret-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users > _______________________________________________ caret-users mailing list [email protected] http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
