a) Flat maps display fine in Connectome Workbench, though we don't really use them much. We have been bringing standard ones onto the relevant FS_LR meshes.
b) Tim will reply in detail to this question. c) This diffusion stuff is still unsupported, but we hope to get it finalized this summer. Aspects (including file formats, mechanisms of display in workbench, and user interfaces) are subject to change without notice or efforts to maintain backwards compatibility. Peace, Matt. From: Colin Reveley <[email protected]> Reply-To: "Caret, SureFit, and SuMS software users" <[email protected]> Date: Sunday, July 14, 2013 12:23 PM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [caret-users] wb functionality Hi - I have a few questions about WB functionality and plans for functionality a) what is the position on flatmaps? can these be displayed (e.g. made in CARET5, saved as "surf.gii", will they work? what if the flat coord file has fewer nodes than the original mesh, which is fine in caret5) b) there's a nice facility to specify a distance from the white or pial surface and make an average "laminar approximate" surface at that distance. but laminae vary in thickness. If one specified multiple distances from the WM at different points on the mesh (with ROIs and e.g. a spline) it could be possible to more accurately follow actual laminar lines in high resolution MRI. I guess that is more of a thought than a question. It would be really useful. c) most importantly: given an FSL BEDPOSTX model, one can "estimate fiber binghams" and also "Takes precomputed bingham parameters from volume files and converts them to the format workbench uses for display." in either case: how does one actually do that? what does the display look like? there is -cifti-create-label and -cifti-convert if one has a GM/WM segmentation, made by e.g. FAST, how can one generate a suitable cifti from it to pass to "-estimate-fiber-binghams? and does it actually matter to -estimate-fiber-binghams what the labels (WM or GM) are? does it treat GM labelled regions somehow differently? I probably don't want to do that (treat them differently in any way). It would certainly be nice to display mean fibre orientations as little vetors like caret_command -map-fsl etc But it seems like there more to this. I can't quite get a grasp on it. I'd like to have a look. The latest stuff is great. Thanks. especially applying flirt transforms to surfs that's really wonderful. best, Colin _______________________________________________ caret-users mailing list [email protected] http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
_______________________________________________ caret-users mailing list [email protected] http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
