Hi,

My volume is in Tal space. Is this a problem?

Audrey-Anne Dubé
Candidate au PhD R/I neuropsychologie
Université de Montréal


On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Donna Dierker <do...@brainvis.wustl.edu>wrote:

> Another thought occurred to me:  If you select a 32k version of the
> Conte69 atlas as your spec file, then you'll get an error when you try to
> open the 164k vertex metric file.  I'm sure there is a way to downsample
> the metric file, and there are also mapping features in Workbench's
> wb_command, if you want to map directly to 32k mesh surfaces.  But we don't
> have a 32k version of Conte69 in caret5.
>
>
> On May 7, 2014, at 9:58 AM, Donna Dierker <do...@brainvis.wustl.edu>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Audrey-Anne,
> >
> > Erin and I tried to do that, but you can't see the menu picks very
> clearly in the video:
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jED8sg9szdU
> >
> > But here are the steps:
> >
> > Download conte69 atlas:
> >
> >
> http://sumsdb.wustl.edu/sums/archivelist.do?archive_id=8293720&archive_name=Conte69_atlas_v2.LR.164k_fs_LR.c5.zip
> >
> > Unpack and cd to the Conte69_164k_fs_LR.c5 directory.
> >
> > Launch caret5.
> >
> > Cancel when spec file dialog comes up.
> >
> > Attributes: Map volume to surface
> >
> > Data mapping type: Metric; Next
> >
> > Add volumes from disk; select volume in MNI space; next
> >
> > Map to spec file with atlas
> >       Note: If you don't see this, then your caret installation is
> incomplete
> > or confused about its parent directory.  Launch from command line.
> >
> > Output spec file: select Conte69_atlas-v2.L.164k_fs_LR.c5.spec
> > Space: FNIRT
> > Atlas: Conte69 Map LEFT midthickness...
> >
> > Next
> >
> > Accept default metric filename
> >
> > Mapping Algorithm:  Enclosing and interpolated are the most popular
> >
> > Next
> >
> > Close when Summary appears
> >
> > File: Open Spec File: Conte69_atlas-v2.L.164k_fs_LR.c5.spec
> >
> > Load scenes
> >
> > Double-click first scene (Conte69 midthickness and inflated...)
> >
> > Toolbar: Spec: Metric: map_data_0_Conte69...
> >       Erase all existing columns
> >
> > Toolbar: D/C: Page Selection: Overlay/underlay Surface
> >       Primary overlay
> >               Data type metric metric
> >
> > You should see it.
> >
> > Donna
> >
> >
> > On May 6, 2014, at 7:36 PM, Audrey-Anne Dubé <audreyanned...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Donna,
> >>
> >> As you suggested, I tried with the Conte69 atlas (164k and 74k), but
> same results. The metric file is recorded in the spec file, but the same
> error shows about different  number of nodes.
> >>
> >> Thanks for paying attention to my problem.
> >>
> >> Would it be possible for you to make an online demonstration, with a
> screen sharing or a screen cast tool? In this way, we may find a way to
> solve the issue faster.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Audrey-Anne Dubé
> >> Candidate au PhD R/I neuropsychologie
> >> Université de Montréal
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Donna Dierker <do...@brainvis.wustl.edu>
> wrote:
> >> Audrey,
> >>
> >> I will look at this more closely later, but this is the step where you
> should be downloading the Conte69 atlas and using one of its visualization
> specs instead of this spec out of the distribution directory:
> >>
> >>> 8. select in  fmri_mapping_files >
> Human.Conte69.midthickness_FNIRT_fMRI-MAPPER.LEFT.164k_fs_LR.spec   as you
> suggested
> >>
> >> The Conte69 atlas is here:
> >>
> >> http://brainvis.wustl.edu/wiki/index.php/Caret:Atlases:Conte69_Atlas
> >>
> >> I wonder if your writing to the fmri_mapping_files that are intended to
> be read-only might cause trouble.
> >>
> >> Also, I would not expect to find a SPHERE or CMW configuration in that
> fmri_mapping_files spec.
> >>
> >> Will look more at this later, but here are some hints as to what looks
> amiss.
> >>
> >> Donna
> >>
> >>
> >> On May 5, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Audrey-Anne Dubé <audreyanned...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Here the attached image
> >>>
> >>> Audrey-Anne Dubé
> >>> Candidate au PhD R/I neuropsychologie
> >>> Université de Montréal
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Audrey-Anne Dubé <
> audreyanned...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Dear Donna,
> >>>
> >>> It is not a read-only issue since the spec files are modified when I
> do the mapping. Here is exactly what I did:
> >>>
> >>> 1. open CARET v5.65
> >>> 2. Attributes > Map volume(s) to surface(s)
> >>> 3. chose Metric for Data mapping type
> >>> 4. Enable entry of volume threshold
> >>> 5. Add volumes from disk --> selected my ALE map, which is a nifti
> image, in Talairach format
> >>> 6. Entered the volume thresholding in the pop-up window (positive:
> 0.028; negative: 0.00)
> >>> 7. Map to spec file with Atlas
> >>> 8. select in  fmri_mapping_files >
> Human.Conte69.midthickness_FNIRT_fMRI-MAPPER.LEFT.164k_fs_LR.spec   as you
> suggested
> >>> 9. Space : FNIRT; Atlas: Conte69 Map LEFT midthickness (164k_LR nodes)
> >>> 10. idem 8 and 9, but with RIGHT
> >>> 11. renamed by data files (L and R)
> >>> 12. Mapping algorith: METRIC_ENCLOSING_VOXEL
> >>> 13. ok (or next), heard a "bip" like there was an error, but the
> summary shows
> >>> 14. Close
> >>> 15. Open spec file >
> Human.Conte69.midthickness_FNIRT_fMRI-MAPPER.LEFT.164k_fs_LR.spec
> >>> 16. check my metric file (please see joint image) > load
> >>> 17. Got this error message
> >>>
> >>> Error
> PDHCEM_Conte69_LEFT_midthickness_164k_fs_LR_5_May_2014_11_13_13.metric:
> Error
> PDHCEM_Conte69_LEFT_midthickness_164k_fs_LR_5_May_2014_11_13_13.metric:
> contains a different number of nodes than
> Conte69.L.midthickness.164k_fs_LR.coord.gii
> >>>
> >>> Pressed ok
> >>>
> >>> 18. The brain image is displayed, but without my data on it
> >>>
> >>> Can you see if I did something wrong?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks very much
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Audrey-Anne Dubé
> >>> Candidate au PhD R/I neuropsychologie
> >>> Université de Montréal
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Donna Dierker <
> do...@brainvis.wustl.edu> wrote:
> >>> Hi Audrey,
> >>>
> >>> Hmmm.  I wonder if this might be because the spec file you name below
> is part of the Caret distribution, and it might be read-only.  In fact,
> it's a good idea for it to be read-only.  The files under data_files are
> intended to be used by Caret without risk of users writing their analysis
> files there.  Is this spec file under $CARET_HOME/data_files or has it been
> copied from there?  And is the directory and spec file writeable?
> >>>
> >>> There are better choices for other visualization specs, e.g., like
> those in this tutorial spec:
> >>>
> >>>
> http://brainmap.wustl.edu/pub/donna/ATLASES/HUMAN/CARET_TUTORIAL_SEPT06.zip
> >>> login pub
> >>> password download
> >>>
> >>> Also, depending on the constraints of your meta-analysis, you might
> consider moving from the PALS atlas to the Conte69 atlas:
> >>>
> >>> http://brainvis.wustl.edu/wiki/index.php/Caret:Atlases:Conte69_Atlas
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Donna
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Apr 30, 2014, at 1:19 PM, Audrey-Anne Dubé <
> audreyanned...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Dear Caret users,
> >>>>
> >>>> I want to map my meta-analysis results on an PALS surface. So I tried
> to map my ALE map (nifti format) to a surface atlas using this spec file
> >>>>
> Human.PALS_B12.LR.MULTI-FIDUCIAL_711-2C_fMRI-MAPPER.B1-12.RIGHT.align2.73730.spec
> >>>>
> >>>> I got this error message:
> >>>> Error PDHCEM_Mapped_to_PALS.RIGHT.73730.metric: Error
> PDHCEM_Mapped_to_PALS.RIGHT.73730.metric: contains a different number of
> nodes than
> Human_Buck_Case12.R.M.RegToPALS_B12.LR.FIDUCIAL_711-2C.align2.73730.coord
> >>>>
> >>>> I cannot figure how to resolve this problem. Help would be greatly
> appreciated!
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank!
> >>>>
> >>>> Audrey-Anne Dubé
> >>>> Candidate au PhD R/I neuropsychologie
> >>>> Université de Montréal
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> caret-users mailing list
> >>>> caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
> >>>> http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> caret-users mailing list
> >>> caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
> >>> http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> <Screen Shot 2014-05-05 at
> 11.18.18.jpg>_______________________________________________
> >>> caret-users mailing list
> >>> caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
> >>> http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> caret-users mailing list
> >> caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
> >> http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> caret-users mailing list
> >> caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
> >> http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > caret-users mailing list
> > caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
> > http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> caret-users mailing list
> caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
> http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
>
_______________________________________________
caret-users mailing list
caret-users@brainvis.wustl.edu
http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users

Reply via email to