donna, yes, they all do match. i just found out that the bug seems to be platform-related: on mac it works fine whereas on linux, the values come out wrong.
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Donna Dierker <[email protected]> wrote: > Are you sure the coord, topo, and metric files all match (i.e., not only > that they have the same number of vertices, but also that those vertices > are in register with one another across data types)? > > > On May 31, 2014, at 9:28 AM, Alexander Walther <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > hi caret users, > > > > i've just recently installed caret on our linux system and struggle with > the smoothing function. as part of my analysis pipeline i want to use caret > to smooth a surface map of correlation values. the values look fine before > smoothing but after having been passed through caret_command -metric > -smoothing (algorithm AN, 25 iterations), the map contains mostly NaNs, > infs, or zero values (inspected in MatLab) and has lost its topology. has > anyone encountered a similar problem with caret? > > > > advice is very appreciated. > > > > cheers > > _______________________________________________ > > caret-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users > > > _______________________________________________ > caret-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users >
_______________________________________________ caret-users mailing list [email protected] http://brainvis.wustl.edu/mailman/listinfo/caret-users
