On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Marvin Addison <[email protected]>wrote:

> I've spent the last several days studying the 3.5 API and it confirms
> some concerns I've had about scope of change.  Everything is changing:
>

I owe you a bottle of vodka or something then since I'm still changing them
every couple of day :-)  I've got a new one I want to discuss on list
tonight that I'll send out after work.



>
>  - Terminology
>  - Package layouts
>  - Core component interfaces
>
> I think when I initially supported the current roadmap,
> https://wiki.jasig.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=28574039, I was
> lacking a concrete picture of the scope of change involved in 3.5.
> It's simply going to be a big release, and it's worth reconsidering
> our numbering.  I think it's reasonable to simply bump our version
> numbers in the roadmap such that 3.5 goes to 4.0 and the subsequent
> releases follow in minor number increases, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3.  I believe
> the numbers matter -- bumping the major number signals a big change,
> which is exactly what we're planning.
>

The reason we hesitated from calling it "4" was because originally we wanted
the SAML2 support to be 4.  However, as reality sets in I'm fine with
calling this version 4 assuming the steering committee goes for it.  Should
we follow up on the steering committee list since other members might be
filtering cas-dev into a folder and reading it sporatically?



>
> M
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev

Reply via email to