I'd personally like to support MOBI, but that may be a certain bias showing
;-)



On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Marvin Addison <[email protected]>wrote:

> > The Markdown route involves more pain in getting to successful scripts to
> > building to documentation deliverable artifacts.  The upsides are in ease
> of
> > authoring and reading the source of the documentation.
>
> It's fairly commonplace for projects of non-trivial size and
> complexity to develop their own tooling to meet the needs of build and
> other ancillary matters.  Developing a markdown maven plugin seems
> fairly straightforward, although I must admit PDF generation sounds
> daunting.  I personally think PDF documentation is borderline
> worthless, but I can appreciate opinions to the contrary.  In any case
> development of tooling to meet our needs seems perfectly justifiable.
>
> M
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>
>

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev

Reply via email to