> Can we deprecate it in 3.4.11? And remove it in 3.5 or 4.0 (whatever we name
> it)?

+1
That's more polite than simply dropping it.

> Obviously retract that if a volunteer steps up to own?

I'd like to see both reasonably broad interest _and_ a maintainer to
keep it.  This thread is to gauge interest, so CAS+BDB users please
raise your hand.

M

-- 
You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: 
arch...@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev

Reply via email to