Sure. That certainly can be done but I was more aiming towards a somewhat
more intelligent way to determine the evaluation order. Doesn't really
have to happen behind the scenes though. For example, once the service url
field loses user focus, we could automatically update the evaluation order
field for a non-patterned address. Users could override that however they
want before they add the service. Does that work?

 

I will certainly review the fluid Reorderer to add D&D functionality. 

 

Regards,

-Misagh



 

From: Scott Battaglia [mailto:scott.battag...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 9:14 PM
To: cas-dev@lists.jasig.org
Subject: Re: [cas-dev] Thoughts on CAS-1013

 

Again, why don't we just make it so you can drag and drop the order from
the management screen UI.

 

The last thing you want to do is give people the option of ordering and
then change the order that they gave you.




On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Misagh Moayyed <mmoay...@unicon.net>
wrote:

I have researched possible options for an algorithm that would attempt to
determine the "strictness" of a regex pattern. The solution seems to come
down to translating the regex pattern to minimalistic state machine from
which symbol counts and number of transition states can be deduced for
comparisons. Having run tests on a small C# demo app that does the
translation, it turns out that this would be computationally somewhat
expensive specially if done for every ticket granting request. (Not to
mention the fact that IMHO it just seems unnecessarily complex.)

Going back to Andrew's use case, I certainly do agree that evaluation of
services should be competent enough to address "more obvious" ones first,
possibly those without utilizing a regex pattern. So as a compromise to
reach a middle ground, it seems to me like we could modify the daos to
evaluate the service URL on save and if no regex pattern exists, the dao
would then automatically up the evaluation order of the service so it'd be
amongst the very first to get examined.

Does this make sense?

P.S: I currently have made changes locally so services by default are
sorted by evaluation order in the UI. That all looks good.

-Misagh




-----Original Message-----
From: Marvin Addison [mailto:marvin.addi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 7:14 AM
To: cas-dev@lists.jasig.org
Subject: Re: [cas-dev] Thoughts on CAS-1013

> 1.       I would imagine that setting up a basic numeric value to
indicate
> order would be much easier to understand than regular expression
patterns.

We want both.  I'm emphatic on that point.  Regular expressions are a
standard pattern matching facility that any reasonably competent
deployer ought to know and be comfortable drafting.  We've had a
number of incidents over the years where the use of Ant patterns has
caused a fair bit of confusion and frustration.  They're just similar
enough to be misleading yet lack the expressive power of a posix
regular expression.

The use of an explicit order field is both clear and performant.
There is no conceivable algorithm for "longest match" that would not
require evaluating against _all_ registered services.  Compare that to
the existing algorithm that short circuits on first match.  We have a
growing list of services and incurring more processing overhead at the
point of granting every ticket is a non-starter.

I'm confident the UI issues with the current service manager are just
that -- matters of user interface design.  I think the ability to sort
by arbitrary column would be beneficial, but they should be sorted by
order by default.

M

--
You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as:

mmoay...@unicon.net

To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev


--
You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as:
scott.battag...@gmail.com
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev

 

-- 
You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as:
mmoay...@unicon.net
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev

-- 
You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: 
arch...@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev

Reply via email to