Is there a compelling feature that would make us want to require 1.6? On Jul 30, 2012 5:09 PM, "Misagh Moayyed" <mmoay...@unicon.net> wrote:
> Team, **** > > Given the next major CAS release in planning, I wanted to propose that we > up the JDK requirement for CAS from the 5 to 6. As far as I know, there > aren’t any particular changes in the codebase that depend on JDK5 > specifically and we at Unicon have been doing CAS deployments based on the > JDK6 platform with much success. (I could possibly safely assume that most > other adopters are already on JDK6, if not later). **** > > ** ** > > I think switching the platform requirement to 6 at the time of a major > release would be a reasonable. Feedback is welcome :)**** > > ** ** > > Regards,**** > > *-*Misagh* > > * > > ** ** > > -- > You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: > scott.battag...@gmail.com > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev > > -- You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: arch...@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
