On 08/01/2012 01:42 PM, Scott Battaglia wrote:
If we're looking to use our position as away to push people to upgrade
their EOL-ed stuff, than I am for making Java 6 the minimum (i.e. some
organizations won't upgrade until something forces them too).
I typically look at it from the perspective of what is in 1.6 (or 1.7)
that is helpful enough to us at the development team to enforce some
minimum on the deployers. I didn't see anything compelling enough in
a 1.6 API for us that made it worth it to force a higher minimum.
Cheers,
Scott
While you might not see anything compelling, one of the libraries you
depend on might. For instance Apache Commons IO recently released
version 2.4, which is dependent on Java 6.
--
You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as:
arch...@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
