Thanks. Having filter definitions through the registry sure seems like the better approach. I think I'll open a new pull to start afresh and port as much as I can over. That might be the cleaner approach.
-Misagh > -----Original Message----- > From: William G. Thompson, Jr. [mailto:wgt...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 9:32 AM > To: cas-dev@lists.jasig.org > Subject: Re: [cas-dev] CAS attribute filters - pull #197 > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:00 AM, jleleu <lel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I reviewed the pull request and was in favor to merge. > > > > Though, when I asked about use cases, all the given examples were for > specific registered services. > > > > So as Scott noticed, the global approach may not be the right > solution. > > > > What I'd like to know is whether there is a chance to have a use case > for which a filter needs to apply globally and not locally to a > specific registered service ? > > > > If no global use case exists, I will be +1 on having the definition > of the filters through the services management webapp. > > This could be "definition of filters through the Services Registry", > however that might be configured (mgmt webapp, json file, etc). > > Best, > Bill > > > > > > > Best regards, > > Jérôme > > > > -- > > You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: > > wgt...@gmail.com To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, > > see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev > > -- > You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: > mmoay...@unicon.net To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, > see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev -- You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: arch...@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
