Hi,

Thanks for your work during Christmas ;-) I'm in line, except one remark...
Best,
Jérôme



2013/12/24 Misagh Moayyed <mmoay...@unicon.net>

> Pending pull: https://github.com/Jasig/cas/pull/380
>
> Misagh
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Jérôme LELEU" <lel...@gmail.com>
> *To: *cas-dev@lists.jasig.org
> *Sent: *Monday, December 23, 2013 7:48:59 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [cas-dev] CAS Protocol v3 Status
>
> Hi,
>
> I just merged the fix for CAS-1403. Though, there is one new issue
> regarding the logout request. Waiting for the associated JIRA...
> The RC3 should be cut after this bug has been fixed also.
> Thanks.
> Best regards,
> Jérôme
>
>
>
> 2013/12/18 Misagh Moayyed <mmoay...@unicon.net>
>
>> Great. I am happy to volunteer and give RC3 a shot once more.
>>
>> So lets sort of put this out to the team: The proposal is to proceed
>> with an RC3 first, preferably by the upcoming weekend and then a GA in the
>> later part of January. (I am assuming that RC3 would also include a fix for
>> the latest kyro serilization issue that Jérôme reported on another
>> thread.)
>>
>> Does this sound reasonable to everyone?
>>
>> Misagh
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From: *"Jérôme LELEU" <lel...@gmail.com>
>> *To: *cas-dev@lists.jasig.org
>> *Sent: *Tuesday, December 17, 2013 9:11:06 AM
>> *Subject: *Re: [cas-dev] CAS Protocol v3 Status
>>
>> I have nothing against an earlier schedule if we can make it...
>>
>>
>> 2013/12/17 Misagh Moayyed <mmoay...@unicon.net>
>>
>>> RC3 sounds good, though I think we can cut it earlier. Practically we
>>> are ready to put together RC3 as early as this weekend perhaps, allow a
>>> couple of weeks and then a GA by say January 21st?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Misagh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Jérôme LELEU [mailto:lel...@gmail.com]
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 17, 2013 12:39 AM
>>> *To:* cas-dev@lists.jasig.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: [cas-dev] CAS Protocol v3 Status
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Using the same date makes sense. Though, the protocol spec won't change
>>> from now. So I wouldn't be annoyed to have a prior date for the spec
>>> release.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regarding the CAS 4.0 release, the main question we need to address is :
>>> do we need one more RC before the final release ? I tend to say yes.
>>>
>>> So, in that case, I would plan a RC3 at the beginning of Juanary and the
>>> final release at the beginning of February, let's say monday, the 3th
>>> February.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What do you think ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Jérôme
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/12/12 Robert Oschwald <robertoschw...@googlemail.com>
>>>
>>> in my opinion we do need a release date for the new specification.
>>>
>>> I recommend we use the same date as for 4.0, as we tag the release in
>>> git, right?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Otherwise, it might be worth thinking of moving the protocol dir out
>>> into the gh-pages branch as Marvin proposed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 12.12.2013 um 17:34 schrieb Jérôme LELEU <lel...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Robert,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not sure to understand why we need the release date of the 4.0 in
>>> the protocol spec.
>>>
>>> Would you mind enlightening me on this ?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Jérôme
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/12/12 Robert Oschwald <robertoschw...@googlemail.com>
>>>
>>> Please note that I will add a new pull request after 355 is merged
>>>
>>> and right before release including:
>>>
>>>  - update the document version to 3.0 (release)
>>>
>>>  - set the Release Date
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> For this, I need a concrete release date from you all.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 12.12.2013 um 12:47 schrieb Misagh Moayyed <mmoay...@unicon.net>:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Update: There are two pending JIRAs that should be the last what's left
>>> on the list before the next release:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> CAS-1284: (protocol doc updates) https://github.com/Jasig/cas/pull/355
>>>
>>> CAS-1283: (new p3 endpoints) https://github.com/Jasig/cas/pull/375
>>>
>>> Misagh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: lel...@gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
>>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: 
>>> robertoschw...@googlemail.com
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
>>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: lel...@gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
>>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: 
>>> mmoay...@unicon.net
>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
>>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>>
>>>  --
>>> You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: lel...@gmail.com
>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
>>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: 
>> mmoay...@unicon.net
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>
>>
>> --
>> You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: lel...@gmail.com
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>>
>>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: 
> mmoay...@unicon.net
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: lel...@gmail.com
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
>
>

-- 
You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: 
arch...@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev

Reply via email to