I would probably suggest FreeMarker over Velocity anyway ;-) The reason for the JSP (versus the SAML method we have) was due to the fact that there was a higher chance people would "adjust" the XML returned. If we can achieve the same level of flexibility (possible via appropriate template methods) then I think we could move to the same method we use for SAML.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Misagh Moayyed <mmoay...@unicon.net> wrote: > My feeling is that the view that is impacted most often is the validation > response. Not much else changes. Right now, we’ve got a fair bit of code > and logic embedded inside the JSP that over time would be hard to maintain > and confusing for people to modify, particularly. It would possibly be > easier if all that code was moved to the appropriate layer, (similar to > SAML views) and we’d let the view handle just the rendering of it (which > isn’t much really). I don’t think the problem we are trying to solve is > related to the choice of the rendering engine. > > > > P.S: Specifically on Velocity, I used the engine when I was writing a > content management portlet for uPortal. Not the best experience, especially > because the project is very dated and Spring support is far better with > JSPs. (Google tells me the last release was 2010). > > > > *From:* Scott Battaglia [mailto:scott.battag...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Sunday, July 27, 2014 7:50 PM > *To:* cas-dev@lists.jasig.org > *Subject:* Re: [cas-dev] Switch from JSPs for protocol views > > > > Is there enough complexity to our protocol views to make it worth it? If > so I've got nothing against it. > > > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Dmitriy Kopylenko <dkopyle...@unicon.net> > wrote: > > CAS devs, > > > > there is a little thread here https://github.com/Jasig/cas/issues/612 about > a possibility of switching from JSPs for CAS protocol views to a more > modern and appropriate template technology e.g. Velocity, etc. > > > > The idea is to discuss it here. There you have it. > > > > Best, > > Dmitriy. > > -- > > You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: > scott.battag...@gmail.com > > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev > > > > > > -- > > You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: > mmoay...@unicon.net > > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev > > -- > You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: > scott.battag...@gmail.com > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev > > -- You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: arch...@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
