Team, I have been looking at and reading a lot about log4j v2 and almost all feedback and reviews have been positive, especially in terms of performance. I have been quietly working on evaluating the effort required to get CAS using log4j v2 and with the little that I have done, all has been going well, except one roadblock and that is perf4j. This is the component/dependency that outputs perf data on various CASImpl functions and collects the stats later on to present to the web layer as a graph. The problem is, the module is very much outdated and the graph/stats functionality is tied to log4j v1. So with that context, here are my questions:
1. How do folks generally feel about upgrading to log4j v2? 2. Would anyone be offended if we removed perf4j and substituted it with something that is better maintained and more recent, both in terms of gathering stats as well the ability to visually represent them? 3. .or, maybe not even provide that functionality any more as its seem to be somewhat dormant? Regards, - Misagh -- You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: arch...@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
