Hi, I'm no JS specialist, we had a discussion on this topic and I proposed to use head.js. That's where we are: https://github.com/Jasig/cas/blob/master/cas-server-webapp/src/main/webapp/js/cas.js
So what would be the advantages of using require.js instead? What about pushing a pull request to see the changes and continue the discussion? Thanks. Best regards, Jérôme 2015-08-01 0:08 GMT+02:00 Lucas Theisen <lucasthei...@pastdev.com>: > I just got done reconfiguring my war overlay to use require.js for all js > including themeing. Even though you don't do much with javascript, I > thought you guys might be interested in the modification. The modification > is not terribly extensive, but it touches a few core files (properties, > jsp, folders structure...). It will make it much easier for others to > control the behavior of their javascript while modifying as few overlay > files as possible. Anyway, I didn't want to put the effort into making it > a pull request if you are not interested... > > What do you think? > > Lucas. > > -- > You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: lel...@gmail.com > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev > > -- You are currently subscribed to cas-dev@lists.jasig.org as: arch...@mail-archive.com To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-dev
