Some of our testers are reporting differences between CAS 3.4.x and
CAS 5.0 SAML responses. Specifically, CAS 3 was returning "samlp"
whereas CAS 5 RC3 is returning "saml1p". E.g.:
<saml1p:Response InResponseTo="foo.hawaii.edu"
IssueInstant="2016-10-04T00:23:48.072Z" MajorVersion="1"
MinorVersion="1" ResponseID="_9665bc3de38234971446b1e7746d449f"
xmlns:saml1p="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.0:protocol">
<saml1p:Status>
<saml1p:StatusCode Value="saml1p:Success"/>
</saml1p:Status>
[...]
</saml1p:Response>
Is this the intended response? The example SAML 1.1 validation response
documented below uses "samlp" rather than "saml1p"
<https://apereo.github.io/cas/development/protocol/CAS-Protocol-Specification.html#saml-response>
-baron
--
Baron Fujimoto <[email protected]> :: UH Information Technology Services
minutas cantorum, minutas balorum, minutas carboratum desendus pantorum
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CAS
Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/a/apereo.org/group/cas-user/.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/a/apereo.org/d/msgid/cas-user/20161005022747.GJ10923%40praenomen.mgt.hawaii.edu.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/a/apereo.org/d/optout.
