Good morning.  Curious if anyone has seen this issue before with CAS running
a pegged CPU as a result of a Hazelcast hiccup.  

 

We run four CAS servers in each environment (QA and PROD):

*       2 x on prem 
*       2 x in the cloud

 

The on-prem CAS servers sit behind a load balancer as do the cloud CAS
servers.  Between campus and on-prem we have a dedicated connection.  

 

Over the last four months, just our cloud CAS servers (both QA and PROD at
the same time) have experienced pegged CPU.  We have been working with
networking to see if we are experiencing a networking hiccup, and thus far
we cannot find one.  

 

Within the log, on days we have encountered the issue, I see thousands of
these messages (just on the AWS QA and PROD CAS servers):

Initialized new cluster connection between /10.21.1.166:<ephemeral port
number> and onePremHost.edu/10.6.55.32:5701

 

When I talked to the Hazelcast folks, they indicated syncing service tickets
and the service registry via Hazelcast across our dedicated connection is
not recommended via the community edition of Hazelcast.  They recommended
using the Enterprise edition which uses message queues instead of TCP/IP
connections to sync the cluster.  

 

Questions:

1.      Is anyone using Hazelcast between on-prem and off-prem CAS servers
2.      Has anyone seen these error messages about Hazelcast and come across
a means to make the cluster more resilient?  

 

 

Thanks, Jay 

 

 

________________________________

Jason Rappaport (he/him)

Identity and Access Management Analyst

Office of Information Technology

Email:   <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] 

Office:  609-258-8464

 

 

-- 
- Website: https://apereo.github.io/cas
- Gitter Chatroom: https://gitter.im/apereo/cas
- List Guidelines: https://goo.gl/1VRrw7
- Contributions: https://goo.gl/mh7qDG
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CAS 
Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/apereo.org/d/msgid/cas-user/BL0PR04MB5156C5A681F279D5364C521BCC0A9%40BL0PR04MB5156.namprd04.prod.outlook.com.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to