Hi - I've observed that the published poms from the `java-cas-client` project don't include the `license` field. That is: https://maven.apache.org/pom.html#Licenses
This can create uncertainty for consumers of the published artifacts; it would be nice to add that metadata to the pom(s). On a related note, I'm no lawyer, but the LICENSE file in the relevant repo looks to *intend* to be the Apache-2.0 License, but the file itself is modified quite a bit, such that GitHub no longer actually recognizes it as the Apache license in its UI. Compare: https://github.com/apereo/java-cas-client/blob/master/LICENSE https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt I wonder if those ought to be updated? Thanks! Nick -- - Website: https://apereo.github.io/cas - Gitter Chatroom: https://gitter.im/apereo/cas - List Guidelines: https://goo.gl/1VRrw7 - Contributions: https://goo.gl/mh7qDG --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CAS Community" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/apereo.org/d/msgid/cas-user/844924a5-b1df-4733-9127-f0875e45522dn%40apereo.org.
