Marvin Addison wrote: >> http://www.ja-sig.org/issues/browse/CAS-663 >> >> Not sure in which state this is. Didn't do tests for this myself > > Fix is still unconfirmed, but got a recent report that maybe it's > still broken.
I had some doubts when reading http://www.ja-sig.org/issues/browse/CAS-663#action_19776 "This solution makes the following important assumption: referrals occur after normal entries. Others working with Spring+AD have confirmed this assumption holds" I would not rely on that assumption. > That said, I believe it is correct to implicate poor > referral handling in this case, but I doubt it's the same issue > reported in CAS-663. Being the reporter of CAS-663 my original intention was to convince you to just drop the referrals (search continuations) returned no matter in which order they are received. I'm not familiar with all the Java/JNDI/Spring APIs though. So I can't help to determine in which component it should be fixed. Ciao, Michael. -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
