> It's the last day to get this right unfortunately, so that's why I was a bit > hasty in posting the previous message, sorry.
No worries. I wonder if the problem you identified with using a SAML 2 artifact handle is technically a bug. Clearly it's not a bug in CAS client/server integration, but we advertise SAML 1.1 compliance which appears is not strictly true. Thoughts? M -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
