Azhar,

Thank you for your suggestion. Initially, I had the same concern. However,
Scott's reply verified that terminating SSL at the VIP works.

Rolly

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Azhar K Mustapha
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> If I am not mistaken CAS is using a secure cookie called CASTGC to enable
> Single Sign On by tracing CAS login. If you tried to load SSL to LB and
> redirect http to the application server, I am afraid the Single Sign On
> might be affected.
>
> A cheaper way is to buy one SSL certificate which hostname is the VIP, and
> put the certificate in all the four servers, At the LB, redirect all https
> request the four servers. Of course, if you tried to access the server
> directly with https, you will get certificate invalid because you are using
> the VIP certificate.
>
> Thank you
> azhar
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:56 AM, Adam Rybicki <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> It's really your call.  If Netscaler can handle SSL in hardware, it
>> would be able to offload the CAS servers from encryption processing.
>> The beauty of this approach is that you only have one certificate and
>> one host that has to match the name in the certificate.
>>
>> Since CAS cluster commonly does not rely on sticky sessions, your VIP
>> does not have to look at the payload, so it could also just pass through
>> encrypted traffic.  Each CAS cluster node would then have to have a copy
>> of a certificate with the same name, and you'd have to make sure that
>> each node accepts the name in the certificate.  This would require
>> playing some DNS or /etc/hosts tricks because the end users must accept
>> that your VIP is the CAS host.
>>
>> Adam
>>
>> Rolly Ferolino wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > We are in the process of implementing CAS in a four-node cluster
>> > behind a Netscaler VIP. What is the best practice for hosting the SSL
>> > certificate? Do we host it on VIP or the servers? If the VIP is
>> > accepting request on port 443, do we forward that request to CAS
>> > server port 8443 (SSL) or to port 80 or 8080 (non-SSL)?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > --
>> > Rolly Ferolino
>> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> > University of Phoenix
>> > --
>> > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
>> [email protected]
>> > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>>
>> --
>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
>> [email protected]
>>
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>>
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>
>


-- 
Rolly Ferolino
[email protected]

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user

Reply via email to