Newer versions of the cleaners include a locking mechanism that should
prevent any issues with running on multiple machines.  Just make sure to
configure it correctly :-)  I think its only as of 3.4.2 though.


On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Jeff Chapin <[email protected]> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sandy,
>
> I am about to go live with my campus' implimentation, and our setup is
> much the same as yours is described.
>
> 1. We use the webflow method. It's what worked for us.
>
> 2. We were having some serious database side issues and proformance
> problems *until* we indexed the foreign keys in the database on (I
> believe) the ticket registry table, and all the problems disappeared. We
> have run the same tests (with Canoo and Selenium) against our cas
> install, and we went from 80%+ of simply login/logout/repeat
> transactions failing, to 0%
>
> 3. I would like this answer as well.
>
> Jeff
>
> Sandy Gordon wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm working on a project to provide CAS on our campus.  We're hoping to
> > cluster two instances of CAS 3.3.5 on Tomcat 6 behind a load balancer.
> > In reading through the list archives and the wiki pages, it seems there
> > are a number of different ways to cluster CAS.  I'm hoping to get some
> > advice regarding these different options:
> >
> > 1. Tomcat session replication vs Spring Web Flow "request state"
> >
> > Configuring Web Flow to use repository-type "client" seems simpler
> > to implement than clustering the two tomcat servers with multicast.
> > Are there any trade-offs or disadvantages to doing it this way?
> >
> > 2. JpaTicketRegistry and table locking issues
> >
> > In our test deployment (one server) we're using the JpaTicketRegistry.
> > I've read the past discussions on the table locking issues that some
> > sites have experienced.  Are these common to all implementations, or
> > are there some databases that don't suffer from this problem?  We're
> > considering both a single Oracle database and multiple Postgres
> > databases with replication via pgpool.  Has anyone had success using
> > pgpool with CAS?  If so, do you still use c3p0, or do you use pgpools
> > own connection pooling?
> >
> > 3. Ticket Registry Cleaners
> >
> > Is it a good idea to run the Ticket Registry Cleaner on both servers in
> > the cluster, or just one?  Or is it better to remove this altogether and
> > run external SQL deletes against the database to remove expired tickets?
> >
> > Any advice is appreciated.  Thanks in advance...
> >
> > Sandy
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sandy Gordon
> > Unix Systems Administrator
> > University of Victoria Libraries
> > [email protected] / 250-721-8266
> >
> >
>
>
> - --
> Jeff Chapin,
> Assistant Systems/Applications Administrator
> ITS-IS, University of Northern Iowa
> Phone: 319-273-3162 Email: [email protected]
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkvgcOgACgkQQiaEUfQoY7QS3QCgjLHMdkpIDCNe9d6zXYGeN+z0
> TesAnjTCGRoR26Qcs5DEY0nJnCSs26xg
> =PAXA
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user

Reply via email to