Yes, in the services management tool. Can we fix this issue at that level? 
What, make it more specific? The specific URL is odd:
> https://wavenet.pepperdine.edu/psp/paprd89/?cmd=start

On Jul 6, 2010, at 4:42 PM, Scott Battaglia wrote:

> 
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Cary, Kim <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks!
> 
> So, which service ID is from the browser and which the client application? 
> I'd like to tell the app devs to fix the issue... are they adding or 
> stripping the ?.
> 
> WHEN REQUESTING TICKET: 
> https://wavenet.pepperdine.edu/psp/paprd89/css/cas.css 
> VALIDATION: https://wavenet.pepperdine.edu/psp/paprd89/css/cas.css?
>  
> 
> Still wondering what happens for the customer? Does the client app get told 
> that the authentication is not successful in this case?
> 
> It depends on the client.  On the Java side, it would probably just mean the 
> CSS wasn't rendered.
>  
> 
> Yes, the higher level is protected at paprd89/**
> 
> In the Services Management tool?
> 
> Cheers,
> Scott
> 
>  
> 
> On Jul 6, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Scott Battaglia wrote:
> 
> > It means that for some reason a ticket was issued to a CSS file.  When that 
> > ticket was validated, the ids didn't match (the service authorization is 
> > not involved here).
> >
> > Normally CSS files aren't protected OR the level above the CSS is protected 
> > and the CSS files share in that session (such that they aren't also issued 
> > an ST)
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Cary, Kim <[email protected]> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > We got a few of these errors over the long weekend:
> >
> > > ServiceTicket [ST-70772-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-pcas] with service 
> > > [https://wavenet.pepperdine.edu/psp/paprd89/css/cas.css does not match 
> > > supplied service [https://wavenet.pepperdine.edu/psp/paprd89/css/cas.css?]
> >
> > Can anyone confirm that this comes from the server checking the ticket 
> > supplying a slightly different (but authorized) service from the service 
> > supplied by the users browser when obtaining this ticket?
> >
> > What is the user experience when this happens?
> > - They are validated and admitted normally to the app?
> > - The client application gets a validation failure from the CAS server and 
> > the user is rejected?
> >
> > KC
> > --
> > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
> > [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
> > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
> >
> >
> > --
> > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
> > [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
> > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
> 
> 
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
> 
> 
> -- 
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user


-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user

Reply via email to