We've been typically trying to make sure that we don't change them because
of issues like this.  Apologies that this happened.

We've got APIs that attempt to alleviate some of these serialization
issues. As a development team, prioritizing the migration to some of these
APIs should become a priority.

Cheers,
Scott


On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Marvin Addison <[email protected]>wrote:

> >  Are TicketGrantingTickets, created under 3.4.10, compatible with 3.4.11?
>
> No, they are not compatible in the context in which you're asking,
> which is serialized form.  This brings up an important issue that we
> the dev team need to address in the near to mid term.  We have been
> very sloppy with the serialized representation of objects when almost
> all storage backends depend on serialization in one form or another.
> I plan to bring up this issue in further detail on the dev list, so
> hop on that list if you care to know more and participate in further
> discussion.
>
> >  When I start 3.4.11, the runs of the ticket cleaner, produce errors
> like the following
> > ...
> > nested exception is javax.persistence.PersistenceException:
> org.hibernate.type.SerializationException: could not deserialize at
> org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.MethodInvokingJobDetailFactoryBean$MethodInvokingJob.executeInternal(MethodInvokingJobDetailFactoryBean.java:273)
>
> It's a known issue, although it may not be widely known and it's
> certainly not documented afaik.  I would recommend deleting all
> tickets from your store immediately following an upgrade.  That is our
> standard practice and I would argue it's best practice for the
> limitations at present.
>
> M
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>
>

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user

Reply via email to