Good to know.
Can I ask what's the configuration you're using?

.- Persistence method on the F5
.- CAS ticket store configuration: a single one behind your three CAS
servers? Each CAS server has their own? 
.- CAS ticket store implementation you're using?

Thanks a lot!

javier

On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 17:02 -0400, Srinivas Varadaraj wrote:
> We do, a 3 node CAS cluster behind  F5 loadbalancer(s) on multiple
> sites with SSL offloaded.
> 
> -sri
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> Thank you.
> Srinivas Varadaraj
> Email: [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> 
>         From: "Javier Fradiletti (Contractor)" <[email protected]>
>         To: [email protected]
>         Sent: Friday, July 6, 2012 8:21:43 AM
>         Subject: RE: [cas-user] reverse proxy & load balancing behind
>         Apache
>         
>         
>         
>         Anyone have used Cisco SLB or F5 LB for load balancing?
>         
>         
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From: b savage [mailto:[email protected]]
>         Sent: Fri 7/6/2012 8:03 AM
>         To: [email protected]
>         Subject: Re: [cas-user] reverse proxy & load balancing behind
>         Apache
>         
>         On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:49 AM, Frank Van Damme
>         <[email protected]>wrote:
>         
>         > 2012/7/5 Philippe MARASSE <[email protected]>:
>         > > Member ;-),
>         > >
>         > > As far as I remember, clustering is not so easy. I've set
>         up a few years
>         > ago
>         > > a clustered CAS involving a few more steps :
>         > >   1 - Clustering tomcat (on-line documentation at apache
>         site is good
>         > > enough)
>         > >   2 - Make CAS redistributable in web.xml
>         > >   3 - Share the tickets registries (JPATicketRegistry if
>         I'm not
>         > mistaken)
>         > >   4 - Use sticky sessions in the balancer
>         > >
>         > > Rdgs
>         >
>         > It looks like mod_balancer does send the same client more or
>         less to
>         > the same backend.
>         > So far I got session replication more or less working (the
>         cas
>         > clustering wiki page says nothing about authentication so
>         I'm also
>         > somewhat worried about session hijacking through the
>         multicast
>         > packages that Tomcat sends - after all, everyone can capture
>         those
>         > packages and it looks like any server can announce himself
>         as a
>         > cluster member).
>         
>         
>         
>         I found a slideshow presentation somewhere that says you don't
>         > actually need session replication because it is only used
>         for storing
>         > the "webflow state", and recommands adding
>         >   repository-type="client"
>         > to
>         >   <flow:executor id="flowExecutor"
>         registry-ref="flowRegistry" >
>         >
>         
>         ... unfortunately I can't test if that works because it is
>         based on an
>         > older Spring version and I can't find the equivalent in
>         newer versions
>         > - that is, if it hasn't just been made obsolete at all.
>         >
>         
>         
>         Good points.  They are highlighted in the warning areas on the
>         clustering
>         page.
>         
>         
>         
>         Many thanks for the advice and pointers,
>         >
>         > --
>         > Frank Van Damme
>         > No part of this copyright message may be reproduced, read or
>         seen,
>         > dead or alive or by any means, including but not limited to
>         telepathy
>         > without the benevolence of the author.
>         >
>         > --
>         > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
>         > [email protected]
>         > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
>         > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>         >
>         
>         --
>         You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
>         [email protected]
>         To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
>         http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>         
>         
>         
>         
>         -- 
>         You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
> [email protected]
>         To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY: Any information contained in this e-mail 
> (including attachments) is the property of The State of Texas and 
> unauthorized disclosure or use is prohibited. Sending, receiving or 
> forwarding of confidential, proprietary and privileged information is 
> prohibited under Lamar Policy. If you received this e-mail in error, 
> please notify the sender and delete this e-mail from your system. 
> 
> -- 
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user



-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user

Reply via email to