> libxml2 seems better maintained, probably due to dependencies from Gnome.
I'm open to a more fully-featured parser. Libxml2 seems reasonable to me. > For a basic SAX approach, I prototyped a toy last year: > https://github.com/forsetti/libcas Looks interesting -- I'll try to review more carefully in the near future. In the end I'd like to pick a reasonable solution and move forward with it. M -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
