Hi Marvin,

Thanks for the quick response. That really clears things up. I remembered
seeing a link to your issue on the wiki page, though the context made me
think it was only relevant to the in-memory approach, not the inspektr
approach. Looking at the code you committed I can see how it impacts both
methods. If it's alright, I think I'll update the wiki with a small section
explaining the new behavior of throttling based on what you've told me.

Thanks,
Evan

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Marvin Addison <[email protected]>wrote:

> > As you can see from my configuration, I want to allow up to 10 failed
> login
> > attempts in one minute. I tried it out, but was blocked after only 3
> > attempts.
>
> I am responsible for this behavior:
>
> https://issues.jasig.org/browse/CAS-1107
>
> I hope I can convince you that it is indeed an improvement. The
> throttles enforce a _rate_ defined in failed attempts per minute. You
> configured 10/minute, which is one authentication every six seconds.
> Thus if you attempted even two successively in less than six seconds,
> the throttle flag would be set, and the third attempt would fail.
> Waiting more than six seconds for a subsequent authentication would
> allow the flag to be cleared and the authentication to proceed.
>
> The discussion on the issue goes into further detail and analysis of
> the behavior; review the unit tests for the gory details.
>
> M
>
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>



-- 
Evan Sheffield
*Developer*
iVantage Health Analytics™ | Formerly HMC, Inc.
300 Chestnut Street, Suite 101 | Needham, MA 02492
o: 781.449.5287 | f: 781.449.8058
 email: [email protected]  web:
www.iVantageHealth.com<http://www.ivantagehealth.com/>

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user

Reply via email to