How is this considering going?  Plans?

 * A patched Java CAS Client 3.2 likely?
 * Deciding not to do that in favor of pushing folks to adopt Java CAS
Client 3.3 and slap the vulnerability blocking filter in the front of
existing implementations until able to adopt Java CAS Client 3.3?

MA> I built one-off patches [of Java CAS Client 3.2 and 3.1] for my
institution, but we will consider providing official patches for those
lines if there is interest.


On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Andrew Petro <[email protected]>
wrote:

> MA> we will consider providing official patches for [Java CAS Client 3.2
> and 3.1] lines if there is interest.
>
> TM> if [fixed versions of 3.2 and 3.1 Java CAS client versions] were
> available that would ease the patching, I'm sure.
>
> Yes, it would ease patching.  I'm finding getting a uPortal 4.0 release
> squared away jumping from a Java CAS Client 3.2 version to 3.3.2 to be
> substantially unpleasant.
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Tim McLaughlin <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2014/08/11, 12:46 PM, "Marvin Addison" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> Does this affect ALL versions of the Java client prior to 3.3.2?
>> >
>> >I did code review of the latest 3.2 and 3.1 versions and they were
>> >both vulnerable. I built one-off patches for my institution, but we
>> >will consider providing official patches for those lines if there is
>> >interest.
>>
>> So far I'm doing fact-finding before I announce to folks here, but if they
>> were available that would ease the patching, I'm sure.  Don't know how
>> much trouble that is.  :)
>>
>> For my couple of apps, I will probably take the opportunity to get
>> current.
>>
>> >
>> >> Also, is there a way to get the 3.3.2 jar without having to do a Maven
>> >> build?  Latest on the downloads site is 3.2.x.
>> >
>> >I noticed there's no download bundle as well. I imagine Scott simply
>> >hasn't gotten to it yet, but I'm sure simply mentioning it here will
>> >make it magically appear :)
>> >
>> >M
>>
>> :) As always, the work of those of you officially involved with CAS is
>> much appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
>>
>>
>> --
>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
>>
>>
>

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user

Reply via email to