Nope, it's used whenever you have user accounts spread across multiple OUs in a 
way that prevents easily computing the DN, thus requiring a search to locate 
the desired object before authentication.

Best regards,
--
Carlos M. Fernández
Sr. Enterprise Systems Admin
Saint Joseph's University
W: 610-660-1501
M: 215-316-1193
E: [email protected]

> On Jan 22, 2015, at 16:49, Chris Cheltenham <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Isn't " BindLdapAuthenticationHandler " for connection pooling only?
> 
> 
> 
> Thank You,
> 
> Chris Cheltenham
> SwainTechs / HHS
> 
> Cell# 267-586-2369
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul B. Henson [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 4:41 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [cas-user] CAS server release v3.5.3
> 
>> From: Andrew Morgan
>> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 12:42 PM
>> 
>> You aren't effected when you use FastBindLdapAuthenticationHandler.
> 
> Thanks for confirming my initial analysis.
> 
>> It's hard to call this a vulnerability, which is probably why they 
>> didn't release it as such.  More like, "here's CAS v3.5.3 which fixes 
>> a security related bug."
> 
> Well, I woke up a bit late this morning and found an announcement in my inbox 
> saying:
> 
> "You must notice that there is a security fix for the "LDAP login with 
> wilcards" attack (CVE-2015-1169). You must upgrade if you use LDAP 
> authentication."
> 
> That already has the buzzwords "security fix" and "must upgrade". Then I 
> looked up the CVE, which includes the title "allows remote attackers to 
> bypass LDAP authentication via crafted wildcards".
> 
> How can anybody not reasonably interpret the two of those as "Oh shit my CAS 
> servers are Swiss cheese and are going to allow unauthorized access to random 
> people" 8-/?
> 
> And then it turns out after a panicked investigation that only some LDAP 
> configurations are vulnerable (not including mine), and even if vulnerable, 
> other than some theoretical issue with confusing a client, there's really not 
> much of a security problem going on. So rather than "MUST UPGRADE NOW!", It's 
> more like "IF you use BindLdapAuthenticationHandler, you should probably 
> upgrade soon to avoid potential as yet unknown issues".
> 
> <sigh>.
> 
> --
> Paul B. Henson  |  (909) 979-6361  |  http://www.cpp.edu/~henson/ Operating 
> Systems and Network Analyst  |  [email protected] California State Polytechnic 
> University  |  Pomona CA 91768
> 
> 
> 
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
> [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access 
> archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
> 
> -- 
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user

Reply via email to