Thank you. Discovered some of the non-CAS integrations a little earlier today.
So we set up our IdP to treat the vendor like Google (SAML 2.0, no encryption, etc.). No joy yet. Vendor claims their CAS 3.5.1 is heavily modified, so the issue is in their lap at the moment. Thanks! Tom. On 08/27/2015 12:55 PM, Misagh Moayyed wrote: > The CAS SAML implementation can work with non-CAS SAML implementations, > namely Google Apps, JICS portal and few others. It depends, but it's safe > to say that SAML2 support in CAS specifically is very limited. It may > receive some attention in future versions. > > In terms of (2), I think you'll find the situation with SAML > implementations almost the same if not slightly worse. Unless the vendor > is using an implementation you know of and can "trust", like the > Shibboleth SP software, all bets are off...and since the protocol is more > difficult to understand, troubleshooting would be more challenging too, > IMO. -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user
