Ignore those. They are expected. What they are telling you is that CAS has
initialized the log4j subsystem via its own CasLoggerFactory and the
actual engine used to process logs is Log4jLoggerFactory. That's all. If
you see anything other than those two, (like if you accidentally include
logback in your overlay) then you have a conflict in your dependencies and
that would be a problem. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Rohmann [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2015 7:05 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [cas-user] 4.1.0 RC2 is released
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On 08/27/2015 01:26 PM, Misagh Moayyed wrote:
> > Also, this is really the first functional release candidate for v4.1;
> > Please ignore 4.1.0 RC1. If you run into issues and anomalies, please
> > discuss and submit issues.
> 
> I just changed the cas-version in my pom.xml to 4.1.0-RC2.
> 
> It still builds fine, but I now get this log4j error about multiple
> loggers being present when deploying / starting the war in Jetty:
> 
> --- cut ---
> 
> SLF4J: Class path contains multiple SLF4J bindings.
> SLF4J: Found binding in
>
[jar:file:/var/cache/jetty8/data/jetty-MYINSTANCE/webapp/WEB-INF/lib/cas-
> server-core-4.1.0-RC2.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class]
> SLF4J: Found binding in
> [jar:file:/var/cache/jetty8/data/jetty-MYINSTANCE/webapp/WEB-
>
INF/lib/log4j-slf4j-impl-2.3.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class]
> SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#multiple_bindings for an
> explanation.
> SLF4J: ILoggerFactory to be used for logging is:
> org.apache.logging.slf4j.Log4jLoggerFactory
> SLF4J: Actual binding is of type [org.slf4j.impl.CasLoggerFactory]
> SLF4J: The following set of substitute loggers may have been accessed
> SLF4J: during the initialization phase. Logging calls during this
> SLF4J: phase were not honored. However, subsequent logging calls to
these
> SLF4J: loggers will work as normally expected.
> SLF4J: See also http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#substituteLogger
> --- cut ---
> 
> 
> Did I overlook anything or do I need to change anything regarding the
> dependencies?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Christian
> 
> 
> --
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
> [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user

-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/cas-user

Reply via email to