Andrew,

The only reason was to avoid large file on the mailing because I do not have
right now any reasonable box for hosting :-)

I send you in private the whole maven site of the client 3.0.


Arnaud


On 6/8/07, Andrew Petro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 Arnaud,

Any reason this shouldn't be posted in public?  this thread is evidence
that were it available someone might use it.

If ja-sig.org is the best place to host it, if you could make the file(s)
available to me I'll be happy to upload them to the ja-sig.org box to be
vended to the web at some reasonable path...

Andrew

Scott,

I've produced the required javadoc and send it to Bill in private.


Arnaud


On 6/8/07, Bill Bailey < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Thanks, Scott. It is not a big problem. I have took a look at the
> source and it appears to be straight forward enough that javadoc probably
> isn't absolutely mandatory. But if you can provide some I would still be
> quite happy to accept it. J
>
>
> Bill Bailey
>
> Senior Developer / DBA
>
> Northland, A Church Distributed
>
>
>
>
>   ------------------------------
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *On Behalf Of *Scott Battaglia
> *Sent:* Friday, June 08, 2007 1:33 PM
> *To:* Yale CAS mailing list
> *Subject:* Re: JavaDoc for CAS Java Client 3.0
>
>
>
> I just tried producing some using the Javadoc tool but it seems to be
> messed up on my PC.  I can try at home over the weekend.
>
> -Scott
>


_______________________________________________
Yale CAS mailing list
[email protected]
http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas




--
Arnaud Lesueur

LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/lesueur
_______________________________________________
Yale CAS mailing list
[email protected]
http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas

Reply via email to