Scott
Battaglia a écrit :
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Pascal
Aubry
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> wrote:
>
> Scott Battaglia a écrit :
>> CAS3 supports the url parameter for passing the value to
the
>> logout page for displaying "Click here to go back to your
>> application."
>>
>> I can't speak for what CAS1 or CAS2 did. I don't believe
there
>> was an official way to do this sort of redirect, though I
believe
>> Yale had implemented a way unofficially.
> I also believe that there was no official way to do it.
Speaking
> of what I know, the *service *parameter was used in the
packages
> esup-cas-server and esup-cas-quick-start (cas v2) to pass the
> logout url to the cas server, i.e. the url the cas server
should
> redirect the user to after logout. The feature had been
proposed
> to the cas developers (Drew Mazurek was managing cas at this
time
> if I remember well) but never added, so class
> edu.yale.its.tp.cas.servlet.Logout had been patched and the
logout
> feature added to 'our' cas distribution.
> Now that cas v3 supports sign out, I think that one parameter
only
> should be used, but which one? Julien (thanks to him) had a
look
> at the cas sources and here is below what he saw. Scott, feel
free
> to correct us if we are wrong.
>
> The way the user is redirected after logout depends on the
> parameter p:followServiceRedirects of the logout controller (cf
Ok. Since phpCAS does not know how the cas server behaves (redirects or
shows a link), it has to pass both url and service parameters. Can you
confirm this?
>
> *
>
>
> * make phpCAS use *url *to comply to the specs, and also
use
> *service *until release 1.1
>
> Using url won't redirect you. Only service will. That's not
going to
> change.
Understood. The service parameter has to be passed as well and will not
be removed.
>
> * Let local adapters (such as Adam with his *destination
> *parameter) patch phpCAS locally
to also pass their
> parameter at logout
>
No change here.
Just one last question: why does cas need two parameters? I feel that
the service parameter could be used instead of the url parameter
everywhere, and that the url parameter is not really needed. Am I wrong?
Are there any scenario where the two parameters could have different
values?
PA
>
> * Strongly invite phpCAS users to switch to the official
cas
> v3 asap.
>
> btw,
http://developer.ja-sig.org/source/
does not respond this
> morning.
>
> Yes, we're working on doing some testing of FishEye with Atlassian
> and they want us to test it without the HTTP connector (which means
> you guys can't see it). You can still do
https://www.ja-sig.org/svn
> I'm not sure unfortunately when we'll have it available to the
public
> again . You're the first one to notice (or at least say anything
;-)).
>
> -Scott
>
>
>
> PA
>
>> -Scott
>>
>> -Scott Battaglia
>> PGP Public Key Id: 0x383733AA
>> LinkedIn:
http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottbattaglia
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Adam Moore
>> <
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
wrote:
>>
>> So would I be correct in saying:
>>
>> CAS 1: ?url="">
>> CAS 2: ?destination=
>> CAS 3: ?service=
>>
>> Scott Battaglia wrote:
>>> CAS 3 will follow the service url for redirecting
back if
>>> its enabled on the LogoutController. If the other
parameters
>>> are there it will probably ignore them.
>>>
>>> -Scott
>>>
>>> -Scott Battaglia
>>> PGP Public Key Id: 0x383733AA
>>> LinkedIn:
http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottbattaglia
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Pascal Aubry
>>> <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> <mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
wrote:
>>>
>>> Adam Moore a écrit :
>>> > I see in the logout method it is using
?service= for
>>> logout url.
>>> > Currently within another project I am
working on
>>> people have different
>>> > parameters for the logout url. For me
?destination=
>>> is what works.
>>> > For others ?url= "" what works and
sometimes ?service=
>>> works. Looking
>>> > at the documentation for cas, it seems
cas 1.0 uses
>>> ?url=. The way we
>>> > handled it in this project is to specify
all three on
>>> the logout url
>>> > and the server can decide which one to
use.
>>> >
>>> > So line 930 in the client.php file could
look like this.
>>> >
>>> > $url = '' . $url .
'&destination=' . $url .
>>> '&service=' . $url;
>>> >
>>> > Thoughts?
>>> >
>>> > Adam
>>> Hi Adam,
>>> I feel that passing the three parameters is
the quick
>>> and dirty way to
>>> make it work. I did it for 1.0.0RC2, please
test.
>>> However, I think that one parameter should be
enough.
>>> What do CAS
>>> developers think about it?
>>> PA
>>>
>>> --
>>>
http://perso.univ-rennes1.fr/pascal.aubry
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Yale CAS mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>