Right, you would need to create an implementation of the SessionMappingStorage and inject it into the filter. Just a warning, but I've never tried it with clustered applications. I have no clue what the results will be (cue scary music)
-Scott -Scott Battaglia PGP Public Key Id: 0x383733AA LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottbattaglia On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Troy Bull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Scott Battaglia > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Its not that it won't work its just that there's additional stuff that > must > > be done because the default filter's storage method is a hashmap-backed > > storage which isn't distributed. You'd have to implement a storage > method > > that spans the entire cluster. > > > > -Scott > > So inside SingleSignOffFilter > > I need to make : > private static SessionMappingStorage SESSION_MAPPING_STORAGE = new > HashMapBackedSessionMappingStorage(); > > cluster aware (or distributable)? > _______________________________________________ > Yale CAS mailing list > [email protected] > http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas >
_______________________________________________ Yale CAS mailing list [email protected] http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas
