Now that is something interesting! What performance expectations did it not meet? Throughput (# logins / second)? Network Utilization?
Thanks, Andy On 10/2/08 3:16 PM, "Scott Battaglia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I probably pasted someone's example. We've never used it successfully here. > And by successful I mean that it met our performance expectations. ;-) > > -Scott > > -Scott Battaglia > PGP Public Key Id: 0x383733AA > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottbattaglia > > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Andrew Ralph Feller, afelle1 <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Scott, >> >> Yeah, I thought yall would have done so lest that feature might not have made >> it into the project. =) Though since SVN blame/praise shows you checked it >> in at revision 39423, I was hoping you had some knowledge about the >> configuration choices made. Was this file provided by someone else >> originally and simply included? >> >> Thank you, >> Andrew >> >> >> On 10/2/08 2:07 PM, "Scott Battaglia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> <http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >>> Sorry, we deploy using repcache (memcached) at Rutgers. >>> >>> -Scott >>> >>> -Scott Battaglia >>> PGP Public Key Id: 0x383733AA >>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/scottbattaglia >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Andrew Ralph Feller, afelle1 >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >>>> Anyone? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10/1/08 2:17 PM, "Andrew Feller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> <http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Since we originally deployed CAS, a sample configuration file for Jboss >>>>> Cache has been distributed with the CAS server ( >>>>> https://www.ja-sig.org/svn/cas3/tags/cas-3-2-1-final/cas-server-integratio >>>>> n-jboss/src/test/resources/jbossTestCache.xml ). Upon comparing it with >>>>> our current configuration, I have noticed there have been several >>>>> discrepancies, which I hoped could be explained. >>>>> >>>>> JGroups discrepancies >>>>> 1. <FD> has been commented out in favor of <FD_SOCK> >>>>> 2. <pbcast.NAKACK> and <UNICAST> are both used >>>>> 3. <FRAG> has been included >>>>> >>>>> JBoss Cache Discrepancies >>>>> 1. UseReplQueue, ReplQueueInterval, ReplQueueMaxElements are declared but >>>>> are only used by asynchronous replication >>>>> 2. TransactionManager is specified yet the online documentation for >>>>> cluster has it being removed ( >>>>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/CASUM/Clustering+CAS ) >>>>> >>>>> My primary focus is on the JGroup changes as I don't know if FD_SOCK uses >>>>> the same notion of shunning as FD. The source behind FD_SOCK shows >>>>> removal of suspect members and broadcasting the removal to the cluster, so >>>>> it should be okay. I am also curious why the <FRAG> entity was >>>>> introduced; were people having replication packets that were too large or >>>>> being blocked due to size? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Andrew -- Andrew R. Feller, Analyst Information Technology Services 200 Fred Frey Building Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, LA 70803 (225) 578-3737 (Office) (225) 578-6400 (Fax)
_______________________________________________ Yale CAS mailing list [email protected] http://tp.its.yale.edu/mailman/listinfo/cas
