[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jonathan Ellis resolved CASSANDRA-603.
--------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Thanks for the explanation.  Committed, w/ parts of the above as comments to 
TokenMetadata.

One minor quibble is, I'd really prefer to avoid having this circular TM <-> 
ReplicationStrategy dependency cycle.  (Which is part of the reason the code 
was structured the way it was: RS would pass TM the info it needed to do its 
thing in a concurrency-safe fashion, w/o needing to reach into RS itself which 
makes auditing for thread-safety much harder).  So if you think of a way to 
refactor that, even better. :)

> pending range collision between nodes
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-603
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-603
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.5
>            Reporter: Chris Goffinet
>             Fix For: 0.5
>
>         Attachments: 603.patch
>
>
> We bootstrapped 5 nodes on the east coast from an existing cluster (5) on 
> west. We waited at least 60 seconds before starting up each node so it would 
> start bootstrapping. We started seeing these types of errors:
>  INFO [GMFD:1] 2009-12-04 01:45:42,065 Gossiper.java (line 568) Node 
> /X.X.X.140 has now joined.
> ERROR [GMFD:1] 2009-12-04 01:46:14,371 DebuggableThreadPoolExecutor.java 
> (line 127) Error in ThreadPoolExecutor
> java.lang.RuntimeException: pending range collision between /X.X.X.139 and 
> /X.X.X.140
>         at 
> org.apache.cassandra.locator.TokenMetadata.addPendingRange(TokenMetadata.java:242)
>         at 
> org.apache.cassandra.service.StorageService.updateBootstrapRanges(StorageService.java:481)
>         at 
> org.apache.cassandra.service.StorageService.onChange(StorageService.java:402)
>         at 
> org.apache.cassandra.gms.Gossiper.doNotifications(Gossiper.java:692)
>         at 
> org.apache.cassandra.gms.Gossiper.applyApplicationStateLocally(Gossiper.java:657)
>         at 
> org.apache.cassandra.gms.Gossiper.applyStateLocally(Gossiper.java:610)
>         at 
> org.apache.cassandra.gms.GossipDigestAckVerbHandler.doVerb(Gossiper.java:978)
>         at 
> org.apache.cassandra.net.MessageDeliveryTask.run(MessageDeliveryTask.java:38)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
> ERROR [GMFD:1] 2009-12-04 01:46:14,378 CassandraDaemon.java (line 71) Fatal 
> exception in thread Thread[GMFD:1,5,main]   
> java.lang.RuntimeException: pending range collision between /X.X.X.139 and 
> /X.X.X.140
> java.lang.RuntimeException: pending range collision between /X.X.X.139 and 
> /X.X.X.140
>         at 
> org.apache.cassandra.locator.TokenMetadata.addPendingRange(TokenMetadata.java:242)
>         at 
> org.apache.cassandra.service.StorageService.updateBootstrapRanges(StorageService.java:481)
>         at 
> org.apache.cassandra.service.StorageService.onChange(StorageService.java:402)
>         at 
> org.apache.cassandra.gms.Gossiper.doNotifications(Gossiper.java:692)
>         at 
> org.apache.cassandra.gms.Gossiper.applyApplicationStateLocally(Gossiper.java:657)
>         at 
> org.apache.cassandra.gms.Gossiper.applyStateLocally(Gossiper.java:610)
>         at 
> org.apache.cassandra.gms.GossipDigestAckVerbHandler.doVerb(Gossiper.java:978)
>         at 
> org.apache.cassandra.net.MessageDeliveryTask.run(MessageDeliveryTask.java:38)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to