[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12800202#action_12800202
]
Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-389:
------------------------------------------
> Perhaps version information is the one thing that should be stored outside
> the file
+1
> SSTable Versioning
> ------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-389
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-389
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Chris Goffinet
> Assignee: Stu Hood
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.9
>
> Attachments: 389-v3.patch, 389-v4.patch,
> 389-v5-1-rebase-v4-for-trunk.diff, 389-v5-2-add-keyspace-to-descriptor.diff,
> 389-v5-3-use-descriptor-for-streaming.diff,
> 389-v5-4-validate-parameters-for-descriptor.diff,
> 389-v5-5-special-case-to-preserve-legacy.diff, CASSANDRA-389.diff,
> CASSANDRA-389.diff
>
>
> As we continue to make changes to the on-disk format of SSTables, I propose
> we start versioning. The easiest way without breaking backwards compatibility
> is to store the version in the filename. This would allow us to figure out
> the version without looking at the SSTable data. After speaking to Jonathan
> here is the proposed example:
> <CF>-<ID>-<VERSION>-<DATA|INDEX|FILTER>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
