[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12804296#action_12804296
]
Jeff Hodges commented on CASSANDRA-734:
---------------------------------------
bq. Not if we do the initTable work, and then later turn it in a NBHM. With
initTable in place, and we go to update a Table, we would only have to do a put
without the conditional instantiation.
(And it seems to me that if it's possible to construct a Table in more than one
thread in our solution to CASSANDRA-44, we're very likely solving CASSANDRA-44
wrong.)
> Table.open has a broken lock in it
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-734
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-734
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.5
> Reporter: Jeff Hodges
> Assignee: Jeff Hodges
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.6
>
> Attachments: broken_lock_in_table_open.patch
>
>
> Table.open's lock is used around the Map#put method call but not the #get.
> This makes it a source of spurious bugs. The attached patch synchronizes the
> entire Table.open method and removes the unused createLock static.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
