[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12829214#action_12829214
]
Jonathan Ellis edited comment on CASSANDRA-342 at 2/3/10 7:36 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
No. That would complicate the StorageProxy model unnecessarily.
If 10s or 30s to use the StorageProxy api is too long then you should probably
start working on getting Hadoop to support jobs in existing [i.e., cassandra]
jvms. :)
Alternatively you could write your own query parallelization code that uses the
same hooks we are building Hadoop support. There's nothing magic about Hadoop
per se.
was (Author: jbellis):
No. That would complicate the StorageProxy model unnecessarily.
If 10s or 30s to use the StorageProxy api is too long then you should probably
start working on getting Hadoop to support jobs in existing [i.e., cassandra]
jvms. :)
> hadoop integration
> ------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-342
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-342
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
> Assignee: Jonathan Ellis
> Attachments:
> 0001-v3-CASSANDRA-342.-Set-up-for-the-hadoop-commits.patch,
> 0001-v4-add-basic-hadoop-support-one-split-per-node.txt,
> 0002-v3-CASSANDRA-342.-Working-hadoop-support.patch,
> 0002-v4-add-wordcount-hadoop-example.txt,
> 0003-v3-CASSANDRA-342.-Adding-the-WordCount-example.patch,
> 0003-v4-add-WordCountSetup-multiple-tests.txt
>
>
> Some discussion on -dev:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cassandra-dev/200907.mbox/%[email protected]%3e
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
