[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841870#action_12841870
]
Jaakko Laine commented on CASSANDRA-833:
----------------------------------------
This issue is not only related to bootstrapping, since nodes leaving the ring
will also cause pending ranges. If a node does not complete leaving operation
properly, obsolete pending ranges will be left in metadata.
(2) above is actually almost exactly how pending ranges is calculated. All
current move operations are finished and pending ranges is calculated according
to what are the new natural endpoints for the ranges in question.
This is not directly related to bootstrapping IMHO, but to the fact that node
movement increases quorum and due to node movement being uncertain, there is
bigger possibility that something goes wrong and quorum nodes cannot be reached.
> fix consistencylevel during bootstrap
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-833
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-833
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 0.5
> Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
> Assignee: Jaakko Laine
> Fix For: 0.6
>
>
> As originally designed, bootstrap nodes should *always* get *all* writes
> under any consistencylevel, so when bootstrap finishes the operator can run
> cleanup on the old nodes w/o fear that he might lose data.
> but if a bootstrap operation fails or is aborted, that means all writes will
> fail until the ex-bootstrapping node is decommissioned. so starting in
> CASSANDRA-722, we just ignore dead nodes in consistencylevel calculations.
> but this breaks the original design. CASSANDRA-822 adds a partial fix for
> this (just adding bootstrap targets into the RF targets and hinting
> normally), but this is still broken under certain conditions. The real fix
> is to consider consistencylevel for two sets of nodes:
> 1. the RF targets as currently existing (no pending ranges)
> 2. the RF targets as they will exist after all movement ops are done
> If we satisfy CL for both sets then we will always be in good shape.
> I'm not sure if we can easily calculate 2. from the current TokenMetadata,
> though.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.