I would definitely prefer the separate -commits list for svn changes.
No strong feelings about jira updates.

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Matthieu Riou <matthieu.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Johan Oskarsson <jo...@oskarsson.nu> wrote:
>
>> Who would have the permissions needed to enable this? One of the
>> committers or a mentor?
>>
>
> Right now everything is setup to go to
> cassandra-comm...@incubator.apache.org. You can subscribe and you'll get the
> commit notifications from Subversion as well. I could change Jira to use
> cassandra-dev but that sometimes create a lot of overhead for casual devs.
>
> So what's the consensus? Keep cassandra-commits or change to cassandra-dev?
>
> Matthieu
>
>
>>
>> /Johan
>>
>> Sandeep Tata wrote:
>> > I agree.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Torsten Curdt <tcu...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 19:19, Johan Oskarsson <jo...@oskarsson.nu>
>> wrote:
>> >>> I would suggest setting it up so that any changes to jira issues are
>> >>> also sent to the dev mailinglist.
>> >>>
>> >>> This way a lot more eyes will see the progress of the development work
>> >>> that would otherwise be hidden in jira. It would create a positive
>> >>> feedback loop of more comments on issues etc.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thoughts on this? Who would have permissions to enable it?
>> >>>
>> >>> /Johan
>> >>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to