Re: proposal: rename to Chris Goffinet Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:16:48 -0700 I think we should keep it as 'table'. It's understood everywhere. I've always even heard BigTable call it a Table? I think namespace might just be more confusing. On Jun 20, 2009, at 6:54 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: Since we're proposing things that break stuff this weekend... :) I think we should rename table to namespace in the config file. Calling it "table" confuses people coming from an rdbms background (i.e. just about everyone). -Jonathan Previous message View by thread View by date Next message proposal: rename <table> to <namespace> Jonathan Ellis Re: proposal: rename <table> to <namespace&... Alexander Staubo Re: proposal: rename <table> to <namespace&... Chris Goffinet Re: proposal: rename <table> to <namesp... Sandeep Tata Re: proposal: rename <table> to <na... Ian Holsman Re: proposal: rename <table> to &l... Jonathan Ellis Re: proposal: rename <table> ... Jonathan Ellis Re: proposal: rename <table&... Chris Goffinet Re: proposal: rename <ta... Jonathan Ellis Re: proposal: rename <table&... Alexander Staubo Re: proposal: rename <ta... Jonathan Ellis Re: proposal: rename <ta... Alexander Staubo Re: proposal: rename <ta... Jonathan Ellis Reply via email to Search the site The Mail Archive home cassandra-dev - all messages cassandra-dev - about the list Expand Previous message Next message The Mail Archive home Add your mailing list FAQ Support Privacy 72F7C4FC-E782-40BE-BFB5-EA424BBA294D@chrisgoffinet.com

[Chris Goffinet]

I think we should keep it as 'table'. It's understood everywhere. I've  
always even heard BigTable call it a Table? I think namespace might  
just be more confusing.

On Jun 20, 2009, at 6:54 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
Since we're proposing things that break stuff this weekend... :)

I think we should rename table to namespace in the config file.
Calling it "table" confuses people coming from an rdbms background
(i.e. just about everyone).

-Jonathan