Right, I see you say 0.4.0 will be along soon after so people shouldn't use 0.3.0 for anything serious, so I guess the question is how soon is soon after?
-Anthony On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 12:23:36AM -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > see the thread about the future of 0.3 > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Anthony > Molinaro<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 06:28:39PM -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > >> > A somewhat related question, I'm using an svn external to keep a tree > >> > in my svn project which builds rpms and maven packages. I currently have > >> > that tree pointed at the HEAD, but that seems risky because its a moving > >> > target. I'd like to point at the 0.3.0 release. Does the > >> > cassandra-0.3.0-rc3 > >> > tag represent that release? (ie, if I were to download the tarball and > >> > checkout that tag would the code be equivalent) > >> > >> Yes, the rc3 tag is what will be released as -final, modulo some yak > >> shaving > >> (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200907.mbox/%[email protected]%3e). > >> The code will be the same. > > > > Oh, I just noticed 0.3 does not include the nodeprobe script, would that be > > hard to backport? I really like the idea of not having to poke holes to get > > at the web server on my cassandra nodes. > > > > -Anthony > > > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Anthony Molinaro <[email protected]> > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Anthony Molinaro <[email protected]>
