On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Bill de hOra <[email protected]> wrote:
> Chris Goffinet wrote: > >> REST is nice if you don't control both endpoints (see the public api >> example). But does it 'really' make sense internally? There is going to be >> some overhead of the constant re-connect over TCP. >> > > That's not a REST quality - you can have a resource style interface over a > held connection. > Moreover, if you feel like you need the extra bit of performance, then use a language-specific binding over Thrift. But if a group of people is interested in adding and maintaining REST/HTTP, I don't really see the problem. Matthieu, intermittently bikeshedding > > Bill >
